_Mosaic Exchange

Last Updated on 4 weeks by newseditor

Recent reports state that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has filed a civil enforcement proceeding against Pennsylvania-based Mosaic Exchange Limited and its CEO, Sean Michael, for allegedly running a fraudulent digital asset commodity scheme in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The CFTC claims that Mosaic Exchange and its operators deceitfully solicited hundreds of thousands of dollars in bitcoin or other funds from at least 17 people in the U.S. and other nations so they could trade BTC and other digital asset commodities on their behalf but instead misappropriated the funds.

False Representations and Fictitious Profits: How Mosaic Exchange Misled Investors

One of the false representations Mosaic Exchange made between February 2019 and June 2021 was that it had a sizable amount of assets under control, implying it was a major player in the cryptocurrency trading market. According to the complaint, Mosaic created a proprietary trading algorithm over the same time frame that had an outstanding 82% accuracy rate and was used to produce significant profits for consumers. Another claim was that Mosaic constantly generated large profit margins ranging from 20% to 60% each month and occasionally even exceeded 50%, giving the impression that it was a tremendously lucrative investment option. 

According to the CFTC, it came to light that Mosaic lost money when trading for its clients and did not have the considerable assets under management that were claimed to be there. Also, the profit margins were unsubstantiated, and Mosaic did not always give investors the high returns they were promised. Furthermore, the complaint claims that the platform lacked the partnerships or broker agreements it claimed to have, misleading clients about its reliability. Many people lost all they had and reported the scam to the CFTC, which is now suing Michael and Mosaic for disgorgement, penalties, and more.

According to CFTC Commissioner Kristin Johnson, the entire plan was a “sham” and a “virtual house of cards” that caused unsuspecting investors to lose a sizable portion of their hard-earned wealth. Johnson highlighted the necessity for more coordinated enforcement actions by pointing out how this instance illustrated numerous risks she had previously expressed concern about. She pointed out that historically, to achieve consumer protection and market integrity objectives, U.S. financial regulators had concentrated on regulatory requirements at the point of intermediation.


The legal action taken by the CFTC against Mosaic Exchange makes clear how important regulatory control is for the cryptocurrency market. This incident highlights the necessity for caution and careful due diligence on the part of crypto investors when thinking about investing in digital assets. Also, it emphasizes the function of regulatory agencies in guarding consumers against scams operating in the cryptocurrency industry. As the investigation progresses, it serves as a reminder that deception and fraud can have serious repercussions for both investors and those responsible.

What's your reaction?
Leave a Comment